Comparison the Vatican Leadership and Iran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/ijosea.v9i2.31Keywords:
Leadership, The Vatican, IranAbstract
Research is called “comparison the vatican leadership and iran”. This study attempts to tell the difference justice and equality leadership the vatican the country and iran by means of membandingan the concept of leadership the two countries . The two countries the vatican and iran have a way leadership different from different religious also, the vatican to the monarchy absolute and iran with teodemokrasi in modification with the government the clergy and modification of this touch three joints sitem repubik, covering those institutions that are commonly called triassic politika (executive, legislative, judiciary). This research using the theory sovereignty the lord and comparison political. Research methodology used is the method comparison. Technique data collection used research library (library research). As for the result of the research indicated differences and similarities the state the vatican and iran by using the theory sovereignty the lord and comparison political .Researchers perceive the difference in leadership the two countries in things up a policy .The concept of leadership the two countries have the difference , to the vatican leadership be to the pope and to the whole residents catholic of the world , different with iran the concept of imamah is at the area of the states iran itself , by one that witnesses equation for leadership the two countries the policies the state only in decided by a single person who considered people to be vice the lord in the world.
Downloads
References
Abud, S. S. (2014). Minoritas Etnis dan Agama di Iran. Pustaka Al-Kautsar.
Abdul Aziz A Schedina. 1991. Kepemimpinan dalam Islam Perspektif Syi’ah. Bandung : Mizan
Adat, P. D. I. P. H., Di Malang, S. T., & Di Malang, T. (n.d.). Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Ri Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Jakarta.
Adian, D. G., & Lubis, A. Y. (2011). Pengantar Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan: Dari David Hume sampai Thomas Kuhn. Penerbit Koekoesan.
Afandi, Muchtar. 1977. Ilmu-Ilmu Kenegaraan (Suatu Studi Perbandingan). Bandung. Lembaga Penelitian FISIP UNPAD
Afshar, H. (1982). Khomeini’s Teachings and their Implications for Women. Feminist Review, 12(1), 59–72.
Arif Maulana, Noor. 2003. Revolusi Islam Iran dan Realisasi Vilayat-I Faqih
Astawa, I Gde Pantja & Suprin Na’a. 2009. Memahami ilmu negara & teori negara Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama
Bagong Suyanto dan sakinah. 2005. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta : kencana.
Bathon, M. N. (2001). The atypical international status of the Holy See. Vand. J. Transnatl. L., 34, 597.
Beversluis, J. (2011). Sourcebook of the world’s religions: An interfaith guide to religion and spirituality. New World Library.
Brownlie, Ian. 1990. Principles of Public International Law
Cornis-Pope, M., & Neubauer, J. (2004). History of the Literary Cultures of East-Central Europe: Types and Stereotypes (Vol. 4). John Benjamins Publishing.
Fitriyana, N. (2013). Infalibilitas Paus dalam Perspektif Gereja Roma Katholik. Intizar, 19(1), 103–128.
Goerge Lenezowski. 1993. Timur Tengah di Tengah Kancah Dunia (Bandung: Sinar Baru).
Gilang, M. A. R. (n.d.). Kebijakan politik republik Islam Iran pada masa pemerintahan Mahmud Ahmadinejad periode pertama.
Haidar, M. A. (1994). Nahdatul Ulama dan Islam di Indonesia: pendekatan fikih dalam politik. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hambali humaidhi. 2013. “syia’h dan konsep wilayatul faqih”. Tesis. Jakarta. Jurusan politik dan hubungan international. Universitas Indonesia.
Hamdan, H. (2014). Wanita Sebagai Kelompok Masyarakat Rentan (Gambaran Kehidupan Wanita Iran Dalam Novel Banat Iran Karya Nahid Rachlin). Muwazah: Jurnal Kajian Gender, 5(1).
Hamid, Zulkifly. 2000. Introduction To Political Science. “Pengantar Ke Perbandingan Politik”. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.Jakarta.
Hasan, H. (2009). Tafsir jender: studi perbandingan antara tokoh Indonesia dan Mesir. Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI.
Husaini Usman dan Purnomo. 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Bandung : Bumi Aksara. Indonesia.
Ilgun, K., Kemmerer, R. A., & Porras, P. A. (1995). State transition analysis: A rule-based intrusion detection approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(3), 181–199.
Ira, M. Lapidus. 1988. A History of Islamic Societies (Cambiridge: Cambridge University Press,).
John L. Esposito. 1996. Islam and Democracy (New York: Oxford University Press,).
Khaiirul, Imam. 2008. “Pemikiran Imam Khomeini Tentang Ayat Wilayat al-Faqih”. Skripsi. Yogyakarta. Jurusan Tafsir Hadist. Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga.
Khomeini, R. (1979). Islamic government. Manor Books Hamilton, ON.
Koten, Y. K. (2010). Partisipasi Politik: Sebuah Analisa atas Etika Politik Aristoteles.
Lihat Riza Sihbudi. 1989. Dinamika Revolusi Iran: Dari Jatuhnya Syah Hingga Wafatnya Ayâtullah Khomeini. Jakarta: Pustaka Hidayah.
Leung, B. (1992). Sino-Vatican relations: problems in conflicting authority, 1976-1986. Cambridge University Press.
Losco, Joseph & Williams. Leonard. 2005. Political Theory,Kajian Klasik dan Kontemporer. Jakarta : Raja Gravindo Persada.
MacArthur, John. 2011. Kitab Kepemimpinan ix. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
Marthaler, Berard . 1993. "The Creed". Twenty-Third Publications.
Martono, N. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif: Analisis Isi dan Analisis Data Sekunder (sampel halaman gratis). RajaGrafindo Persada.
Mohtar Masoed. 2001. Perbandingan Sistem Politik. Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada University Press
Meyer, C. (1999). Political legitimacy and the invisibility of politics: Exploring the European Union’s communication deficit. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 617–639.
Morris, C. (1989). The Papal Monarchy: the western church from 1050 to 1250. Clarendon Press.
Nazir, Mohammad. 1998. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
Nicolson, H. (2001). The evolution of diplomatic method. University of Leicester.
Pasaribu, Anton. 2004. Tahta Suci Paus Edisi ke-2. Bekasi: Penerbit Krista Mitra Pustaka.
Putri, G. E., Nurhayati, R. T., & Sip, M. A. (2010). Pandangan Politik Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Studi Kasus: Hubungan Iran-Amerika Serikat. [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Rahmat, jalaluddin. 2002. Antara Al-Farabi dan Khomaini. Bandung:Mizan
Rapar, j.h. 2001. Filsafat poloitik. Jakarta : PT. raja grafindo.
Renehan, E. (2006). Pope John Paul II. Infobase Publishing.
Reynolds, C. A. (1982). The music chapel at San Pietro in Vaticano in the later fifteenth century. Princeton University.
Roddick, A. (2013). Business as unusual. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Saefuddin, D. (n.d.). Iran masa pemerintahan Khatami 1997-2001.
Semma, M. (2008). Negara dan korupsi: pemikiran Mochtar Lubis atas negara, manusia Indonesia, dan perilaku politik. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Stehlin, S. A. (1983). Weimar and the Vatican, 1919-1933: German-Vatican diplomatic relations in the interwar years. Princeton University Press.
Suhelmi, Ahmad., 1999. Pemikiran Politik Barat. Darul Falah:Jakarta.
Syarbaini, Syahrial dkk. 2011. Pengetahuan Dasar Ilmu Politik. Bogor:Ghalia
Tamar, M., & Murfhi, A. (2009). Pengaruh Agama Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Negara (Studi Kasus Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Islam Iran). Jurnal Administrasi Dan Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia, 2(2), 145–154.
T. Hunter, Shireen. 1992. Iran After Khomeini (Washington DC: CSIS)
Thabathaba’i, alamah M.H. 1993. islam Syiah. Grafiti : jakarta.
Unsworth, V. F. (1977). American Catholic Missions And Communist China, 1945-1953. New York University.
Yamani. 2002. Antara Al-Farabi dan Khomeini. Bandung : Mizan.
Zed, M. (2004). Metode peneletian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art is licensed under a 