Legal argumentation of corporate criminal liability for trading cryptocurrency e-dinar coin (EDC) with ponzi scheme

Authors

  • Weshley Gde Putra Cahyono Universitas Pembangunan Veteran Jawa Timur
  • Yana Indawati Universitas Pembangunan Veteran Jawa Timur,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijosea.v13i2.369

Keywords:

Cryptocurrency Trading, E-dinar coin (EDC), Criminal Liability, Corporation

Abstract

The development of technology, information, and industry 4.o, this has an impact on the increasing economic needs of the community, with this development indirectly encouraging the economy in the industrial sector, more and more corporations are carrying out business activities in the field of cryptocurrency trading where the rules for this activity are still gray in Indonesia, and can cause criminal acts including fraud, and fraudulent investment. Therefore, criminal acts on cryptocurrency trading e-dinar coin (edc) with ponzi schemes carried out by corporations must be taken seriously to protect and provide accountability to the people of Indonesia, according to the author's analysis, the unclear rules of Tranding cryptocurrency with ponzi schemes carried out by corporations, influenced by law enforcement factors that are still not perfect to fulfill justice in society, therefore there is still a need for laws that explicitly regulate cryptocurrency trading activities with ponzi schemes carried out by corporations, as well as a criminal liability system in corporate criminal acts with ponzi schemes if associated with the theory of corporate liability systems, then those who can be held criminally responsible and bear are corporations and administrators because if only punishing one is not enough to bring a sense of justice and security in society

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldridge, Irene. 2013. High-Frequency Trading: A Practical Guide to Algorithmic Strategies and Trading Systems. Vol. 604. John Wiley & Sons.

Amanda, Shilvia, and Sayid Mohammad Rifqi Noval. 2020. “Penegakan Hukum Praktik Money Game Dengan Skema Ponzi Dalam Investasi Ilegal Pada Aplikasi Tiktok E- Cash Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara 3(2).

Amir, Ari Yusuf. 2020. Doktrin-Doktrin Pidana Korporasi. Yogyakarta: Arruz Media.

Anggriawan, Rizaldy, Muh Susila, Ming Sung, and Dwilani Irrynta. 2023. “The Rising Tide of Financial Crime: A Ponzi Scheme Case Analysis.” Lex Scientia Law Review 7(1).

Apriliani, Muttaqim. 2019. “Analysis of The Probability of Money Laundering Crimes toward the Development of Crypto-Currency Regulations in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 4(1):29–40.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2003. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Atmasasmita, Romli. 2018. Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan: Geen Straf Zonder Schuld. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Attaran, Mohsen. 2023. “The Impact of 5G on the Evolution of Intelligent Automation and Industry Digitization.” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 14(5):5977–93.

Budianto, Agus. 2020. “Legal Research Methodology Reposition in Research on Social Science.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9:1339–46.

Eddy O.S., and Hiarij. 2014. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Elder, Alexander. 1993. Trading for a Living: Psychology, Trading Tactics, Money Management. Vol. 31. John Wiley & Sons.

Ingrams, Alex. 2017. “The Legal‐normative Conditions of Police Transparency: A Configurational Approach to Open Data Adoption Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Public Administration 95(2):527–45.

Investopedia. n.d. “Trade Definition in Finance: Benefits and How It Works.” Investopedia.Com.

Kethineni, Sesha, and Ying Cao. 2019. “The Rise in Popularity of Cryptocurrency and Associated Criminal Activity.” International Criminal Justice Review 1(20).

Kusuma, Teddy. 2020. “Cryptocurrency for Commodity Futures Trade in Indonesia: Perspective of Islamic Law.” Journal of Islamic Banking & Finance 37(1).

Leeuw, Frans L., and Hans Schmeets. 2016. Empirical Legal Research: A Guidance Book for Lawyers, Legislators and Regulators. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lorien, Natalia, and Tantimin. 2020. “Investasi Bodong Dengan Sistem Skema Ponzi: Kajian Hukum Pidana.” E-Journal Komunikasi Yustisia 5(1).

Lupianto, Ezzah Nariswari. 2022. “Asset Recovery for Victims of ‘Binary Option’ Case in Review of International Criminal Law.” Corruptio 3(1):47–60.

Mahasena, Adhyaksa. 2018. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Jual Beli Organ Tubuh Manusia.” Urnal Magister Hukum Udayana.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2010. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mugarura, Norman. 2017. “The Use of Anti-Money Laundering Tools to Regulate Ponzi and Other Fraudulent Investment Schemes.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 20(3).

Muladi, and Dwidja Priyatno. 2012. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Muladi, and Dwidja Priyatno. n.d. Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana. Bandung: STIH Bandung.

Murphy, Tim, and Vincent O’Connell. 2013. “Discourses Surrounding the Evolution of the IASB/FASB Conceptual Framework: What They Reveal about the ‘Living Law’ of Accounting.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 38(1):72–91.

Negara, Tunggul Ansari Setia. 2023. “Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches.” Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 4(1):1–9.

Priyatno, Dwidja. 2017. Kebijakan Legislasi Tentang Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Rhizaldy, Vicky, B. W., and D. P. M. 2019. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Pada Bisnis Skema Ponzi Di Indonesia.” Student Journal UB.

Rhizaldy, Vicky, B. W., and D. P. M. 2019. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Pada Bisnis Skema Ponzi Di Indonesia.” Student Journal UB.

Sacipto, Rian, Akhmad Yasin, and Ardy Firman Syah. 2023. “GOVERNMENT ROLE ANALYSIS: CRYPTOCURRENCIES REVIEW OF THEORY, ISLAMIC LAW AND POLICY IN INDONESIA.” Pp. 871–83 in PROCEEDING OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, SOCIETY AND HUMANITY. Vol. 1.

Santi, Mei, Misbakhul Khaer, and Wahyu Firmansyah. 2023. “Implementation of Buying and Selling Transactions in the Perspective of Islamic Economics:(Case Study of Traders at the Kauman People’s Market, Tulungagung).” EKSYAR: Jurnal Ekonomi Syari’ah & Bisnis Islam (e-Journal) 10(1):67–78.

Sari, Madelin Ezra, and Patricia Rinwigati. 2023. “Urgensi Pembentukan Peraturan Mengenai Skema Ponzi Di Indonesia.” UNES Law Review 5(4).

Shanty, Lilik. 2017. “Aspek Teori Hukum Dalam Kejahatan Korporasi.” Palar | Pakuan Law Review 3(1).

Soekanto, Soerjono. 2007. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. 2003. Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudarwanto, Al Sentot, and Dona Budi Kharisma. 2023. “Law Enforcement against Investment Fraud: A Comparison Study from the USA and Canada with a Case Study on Binary Options in Indonesia.” Safer Communities.

Taekema, Sanne. 2018. “Theoretical and Normative Frameworks for Legal Research: Putting Theory into Practice.” Law and Method.

Yuspin, Wardah, and Qolbi Hanif Fadhlulloh. 2022. “Ponzi Scheme: Risk and Regulation in Indonesia.” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 5(10).

Lescrauwaet, L., Wagner, H., Yoon, C., & Shukla, S. (2022). Adaptive Legal Frameworks and Economic Dynamics in Emerging Tech-nologies: Navigating the Intersection for Responsible Innovation. Law and Economics, 16(3), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v16i3.61

Darvishi, K., Liu, L., & Lim, S. (2022). Navigating the Nexus: Legal and Economic Implications of Emerging Tech-nologies. Law and Economics, 16(3), 172–186. Retrieved from https://journals.ristek.or.id/index.php/LE/article/view/59

Downloads

Published

2023-08-30

How to Cite

Weshley Gde Putra Cahyono, & Yana Indawati. (2023). Legal argumentation of corporate criminal liability for trading cryptocurrency e-dinar coin (EDC) with ponzi scheme . International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art, 13(2), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijosea.v13i2.369