Humanist Approach as the Key to Successful Investigation of Terrorism Cases by Densus 88

Authors

  • Sapto Priyanto Universitas Indonesia

Keywords:

terrorism, discretion, humanistic approach, Densus 88, human rights

Abstract

Counter-terrorism efforts in Indonesia face significant challenges, including suspect resistance during investigations and resource limitations. This study analyzes the discretionary practices of Densus 88 AT Polri, particularly through humanistic approaches such as reuniting suspects with their families, granting communication access, and respecting spiritual needs. The findings show that humanistic discretion effectively enhances suspect cooperation, streamlines evidence collection, and strengthens legal legitimacy. This approach also upholds principles of justice and human rights. However, the implementation of discretion requires strict boundaries to ensure accountability and prevent abuse. A holistic strategy integrating repressive measures with humanistic approaches has proven successful not only in law enforcement but also in supporting the social reintegration of former terrorism convicts. This study recommends strengthening regulatory frameworks for discretionary practices to ensure effectiveness and alignment with human rights principles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amrullah, Z. (2007, Juni 15). Polisi Umumkan Penangkapan Pemimpin JI. DW. https://www.dw.com/id/polisi-umumkan-penangkapan-pemimpin-ji/a-2956375

Bakker, E., & de Graaf, B. (Ed.). (2011). Countering Terrorism: Can We Meet the Threat of Global Violence? Routledge.

Bernard, H. R. (2018). Metode Penelitian Antropologi: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Rowman & Littlefield.

Borum, R. (2011). Radicalization into Violent Extremism I: A Review of Social Science Theories. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 7–36.

Devroe, E., & Ponsaers, P. (2018). The Power Context of Police Reform in Belgium, The Brussels Case: A Shift in the Style of Policing after the Terrorist Attacks. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1–15.

Goldstein, H. (1977). Policing a free society. Harvard University Press.

Gunaratna, R., & Hassan, M. H. (2015). Terrorist rehabilitation: A new frontier in counter-terrorism. Imperial College Press.

Hafil, M. (2021, September 27). Atasi Terorisme, Kadensus 88: Perlu Pendekatan Humanisme. Republika. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/r01k8l430/atasi-terorisme-kadensus-88-perlu-pendekatan-humanisme

Harahap, M. Y. (2009). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Sinar Grafika.

Hassan, M. H. (2012). Understanding takhfiri ideology in militant Islam. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 35(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2012.630200

Horgan, J. (2005). The Psychology of Terrorism. Routledge.

HR. (2020). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT). (2018). Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters: Approaches and Challenges.

International Crisis Group (ICG). (2016). Dealing with Jihadists in Jails: A Look at Efforts to Deradicalize Terrorist Detainees.

Jaffel, H. B. (2020). Britain’s European Connection in Counter-terrorism intelligence cooperation: Everyday practices of police liaision officers. Intelligence and National Security, 1–19.

Kaunert, C., & Leonard, S. (2019). The collective securitisation of terrorism in the European Union. West European Politics, 261–277.

Kompas. (2024, Desember 26). Pendekatan Densus 88 yang Berhasil. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/pendekatan-densus-88-yang-berhasil

Maras, M. H. (2013). Counterterrorism. Jones & Bartlett Learning

McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2009). All You Need to Know About Action Research. Sage Publications.

Prasetyo, D. (2021). Diskresi Kepolisian pada Tahap Penangkapan Tersangka Terorisme. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Prasetyo, S. (2024). JI The Untold Story: Perjalanan Kisah Jemaah Islamiyah. Elex Media Komputindo.

Pulungan, T. (2021, Maret 22). Penerapan Soft Approach oleh Densus 88 dalam Menangani Terorisme Diapresiasi. SINDO News. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/372194/13/penerapan-soft-approach-oleh-densus-88-dalam-menangani-terorisme-diapresiasi-1616382213

Reiner, R. (2010). The politics of the police (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Riyanto, D. (2019). Discretion of Investigators of the Indonesian National Police. Mizan: Journal of Legal Sciences, 8(2).

Sari, D. (2019). Pengawasan Internal dan Eksternal dalam Penegakan Hukum oleh Polri. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 5(1), 45-60.

Schmid, A. P. (2013). Radicalisation, deradicalisation, counter-radicalisation: A conceptual discussion and literature review. ICCT Research Paper.

Setiawan, A. (2021). Diskresi Penyidikan dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Sebuah Tinjauan Kritis. Jurnal Hukum, 12(2), 123-139

Smith, G., & Alpert, G. P. (2007). Ethics in policing: Professional standards. Policing and Society, 17(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460701718556

Wahid, A. S., & Sidiq, M. I. (2004). Kejahatan Terorisme Perspektif Agama, HAM, dan Hukum. Raflika Aditama.

Widodo, B. (2022). Peran Masyarakat dalam Pengawasan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial dan Hukum, 8(3), 200-215

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Priyanto, S. (2025). Humanist Approach as the Key to Successful Investigation of Terrorism Cases by Densus 88. International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art, 14(4), 446–456. Retrieved from https://ijosea.isha.or.id/index.php/ijosea/article/view/680