The Role of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk in Establishing the Republic of Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/ijosea.v9i2.8Keywords:
Republic of Turkey, The role of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Establishment of the Turkish StateAbstract
Before becoming a republic, Turkey was the last Islamic dynasty called the Ottoman Turks. The territory of the Ottoman Turks was very broad which made it a force respected by the international community, especially European countries. The technological advances that occurred in Europe were not in line with what happened in the Ottoman Turks which resulted in this sultanate becoming weak and left behind from more advanced European countries. Moving on from situations and conditions like this, a military officer who had a sense of nationalism came and initiated a republic to replace the Islamic government system which was considered old-fashioned and unable to bring the country into progress like European countries. This desire finally manifested itself through various means of struggle and movement which was quite long and led him to become the first leader of the Republic of Turkey which he formed.
Downloads
References
Akçam, T. (2004). From empire to republic: Turkish nationalism and the Armenian genocide. Zed Books.
Aksakal, M. (2008). The Ottoman road to war in 1914: the Ottoman Empire and the First World War. Cambridge University Press.
Bozdağlioğlu, Y. (2008). Modernity, identity and Turkey’s foreign policy. Insight Turkey, 55–75.
Byrd, B. W. (1959). TURKISH WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1919-1923. American University.
Coakley, J. (2004). Mobilizing the past: Nationalist images of history. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 10(4), 531–560.
Davison, R. H. (2011). Essays in Ottoman and Turkish history, 1774-1923: the impact of the West (Vol. 16). University of Texas Press.
Deringil, S. (2010). The Struggle against Shiism in Hamidian Iraq: A Study in Ottoman Counter-Propaganda. In The Ottomans, the Turks and World Power Politics (pp. 57–72). Gorgias Press.
Dönmez-Colin, G. (2008). Turkish cinema: Identity, distance and belonging. Reaktion Books.
Frick, A. (2011). Turkey’s secularism: Has the AKP undermined the ideals of Ataturk? University of South Dakota.
Goffman, D. (2002). The Ottoman empire and early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Hayton, D. (2007). Astrology as political propaganda: humanist responses to the Turkish threat in early-sixteenth-century Vienna. Austrian History Yearbook, 38, 61–91.
Heper, M. (1980). Center and periphery in the Ottoman Empire: With special reference to the nineteenth century. International Political Science Review, 1(1), 81–104.
Heper, M. (2000). The Ottoman legacy and Turkish politics. Journal of International Affairs, 63–82.
Hess, A. C. (1970). The evolution of the Ottoman seaborne empire in the age of the oceanic discoveries, 1453-1525. The American Historical Review, 75(7), 1892–1919.
Karabelias, G. (1999). The evolution of civil‐military relations in post‐war Turkey, 1980–95. Middle Eastern Studies, 35(4), 130–151.
Kasaba, R. (1988). The Ottoman Empire and the world economy: The nineteenth century. Suny Press.
Klasik, D. M., & Tengah, H. M. (2007). Sejarah Pemikiran dan Peradaban Islam.
Koenig, T., Mihelj, S., Downey, J., & Gencel Bek, M. (2006). Media framings of the issue of Turkish accession to the EU: a European or national process? Innovation, 19(2), 149–169.
Kramer, A. (2008). Dynamic of destruction: culture and mass killing in the First World War. OUP Oxford.
Kunt, M. I. (1974). Ethnic-regional (cins) solidarity in the seventeenth-century Ottoman establishment. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 5(3), 233–239.
Maarif, A. S. (2009). Islam dalam bingkai keindonesiaan dan kemanusiaan: sebuah refleksi sejarah. PT Mizan Publika.
Mardin, Ş. (1973). Center-periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics? Daedalus, 169–190.
Nazir, M. (1988). MetodePenelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Quataert, D. (2005). The Ottoman Empire, 1700-1922. Cambridge University Press.
Rabasa, A., & Larrabee, F. S. (2008). The rise of political Islam in Turkey (Vol. 726). Rand Corporation.
Rodda, J. C., & Ubertini, L. (2004). The Basis of Civilization--water Science? (Issue 286). International Assn of Hydrological Sciences.
Sarinay, Y. (2004). Turkish Foreign Policy in the Atatürk Period (1919-1938). Études Balkaniques, 3, 121–126.
Semiawan, C. R. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Grasindo.
Shaw, S. J., & Shaw, E. K. (1976). History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey: Volume 1, Empire of the Gazis: The Rise and Decline of the Ottoman Empire 1280-1808 (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, S. J., & Shaw, E. K. (1977). History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey: Volume 2, Reform, Revolution, and Republic: The Rise of Modern Turkey 1808-1975 (Vol. 11). Cambridge University Press.
Silalahi, U. (2006). Metode penelitian sosial. Unpar press.
Syauqi, M. L. (n.d.). Pengaruh modernisasi di Turki atas penafsiran Bediuzzaman Said Nursi.
Toprak, B. (2011). The state, politics, and religion in Turkey. In State, Democracy, and the Military (pp. 119–136). de Gruyter.
Uslu, N. (2004). Turkish foreign policy in the post-Cold War period. Nova Publishers.
Zed, M. (2004). Metode peneletian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art is licensed under a 