Mixed Methods Approach In Business Management Research: Advantages And Applications In An Organizational Context

Authors

  • Hasni Dyah Kurniawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Karanganyar, INDONESIA
  • Saefudin Saefudin Muhammadiyah University of Karanganyar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijosea.v15i3.847

Keywords:

Business Management, Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Methods

Abstract

This article aims to explore the theoretical foundations, applications, and benefits of mixed methods in business management by highlighting its philosophical foundations in pragmatism and its ability to integrate diverse perspectives. This article uses qualitative techniques with a literature review approach to mixed methods research in business management. The results of this study highlight the importance of methodological pluralism in overcoming biases and limitations of single-method designs. Practical applications of mixed methods in business management research include their use in understanding organizational complexity, refining decision-making processes, and enhancing research instrument development. Despite challenges such as integration difficulties and resource requirements, mixed methods research offers unparalleled potential to address complex business management problems and foster innovative and actionable solutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barbour, R. S. (1999). The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 4(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/135581969900400110

Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. In Organizational Research Methods.

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs - Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 PART2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Ghiara, V. (2020). Disambiguating the Role of Paradigms in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818819928

Greene, J. C. (2006). Toward a Methodology of Mixed Methods Social Inquiry. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 93–98.

Gunasekare, T. P. (2015). Mixed Research Method as Third Research Paradigm. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) , 2013, 361–367. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2735996

Harrison, R. L. (2013). Using mixed methods designs in the journal of business research, 1990-2010. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2153–2162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.006

Harrison, R. L., Reilly, T. M., & Creswell, J. W. (2020). Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819900585

Johnson, R. B. (2012). Dialectical Pluralism and Mixed Research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 751–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212442494

Johnson, R. B., Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, & Lisa A. Turner. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Handbook of Research Methods in International Relations, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n435

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality and Quantity, 43(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

McKim, C. A. (2017). The Value of Mixed Methods Research: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607096

McLaughlin, J. E., Bush, A. A., & Zeeman, J. M. (2016). Mixed methods: Expanding research methodologies in pharmacy education. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(5), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.06.015

Mertens, D. M. (2012). What Comes First? The Paradigm or the Approach? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812461574

Moinuddin, M., Abro, Q., & Khurshid, M. A. (2015). The Use of Mixed Methods in Management Research. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 5(2), 103–108.

O’cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Integration and Publications as Indicators of “Yield” From Mixed Methods Studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806299094

Smajic, E., Avdic, D., Pasic, A., Prcic, A., & Stancic, M. (2022). Mixed Methodology of Scientific Research in Healthcare. Acta Informatica Medica, 30(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2022.30.57-60

Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2008). Mixed Methodology Across Disciplines. Journal of Mixed Research Methods, 2(1), 3–6. http://online.sagepub.com

Uprichard, E., & Dawney, L. (2019). Data Diffraction: Challenging Data Integration in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816674650

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Kurniawati, H. D., & Saefudin, S. (2025). Mixed Methods Approach In Business Management Research: Advantages And Applications In An Organizational Context. International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art, 15(3), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijosea.v15i3.847

Issue

Section

Articles